Journalists push back: New York Times reporter sues AI firms over copyright concerns

Journalists push back: New York Times reporter sues AI firms over copyright concerns

Investigative reporter John Carreyrou and five authors are suing major AI firms for alleged copyright violations, amid a surge in IP lawsuits this year. What will this mean for the industry?

NeboAI I summarize the news with data, figures and context
IN 30 SECONDS

IN 1 SENTENCE

SENTIMENT
Neutral

𒀭
NeboAI is working, please wait...
Preparing detailed analysis
Quick summary completed
Extracting data, figures and quotes...
Identifying key players and context
DETAILED ANALYSIS
SHARE

NeboAI produces automated editions of journalistic texts in the form of summaries and analyses. Its experimental results are based on artificial intelligence. As an AI edition, texts may occasionally contain errors, omissions, incorrect data relationships and other unforeseen inaccuracies. We recommend verifying the content.

On Monday, investigative journalist John Carreyrou initiated legal action against major tech firms including xAI, Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, Meta, and Perplexity, alleging unauthorized use of copyrighted materials in training their AI models. Joined by five fellow writers, Carreyrou asserts that these companies have encroached on their intellectual property rights.

This lawsuit is part of a broader trend, as various content creators, including major film studios and news organizations, have increasingly turned to legal avenues against AI companies this year. The complaints have led to some settlements, such as a licensing agreement between Disney and OpenAI.

Interestingly, the lawsuit is filed by individual authors rather than as a class action, which the plaintiffs claim is a deliberate choice to ensure their claims are adequately addressed. The complaint emphasizes that large language model companies should not be allowed to easily dismiss significant claims.

In the context of prior legal disputes, Anthropic recently settled a class-action lawsuit with authors for $1.5 billion. The current complaint highlights that participants in that case will only receive a minuscule portion of the potential damages, raising concerns about the adequacy of compensation for creators.

Want to read the full article? Access the original article with all the details.
Read Original Article
TL;DR

This article is an original summary for informational purposes. Image credits and full coverage at the original source. · View Content Policy

Editorial
Editorial Staff

Our editorial team works around the clock to bring you the latest tech news, trends, and insights from the industry. We cover everything from artificial intelligence breakthroughs to startup funding rounds, gadget launches, and cybersecurity threats. Our mission is to keep you informed with accurate, timely, and relevant technology coverage.

Press Enter to search or ESC to close