California's Proposed 5% Wealth Tax Faces Backlash from Crypto Industry Leaders

California's Proposed 5% Wealth Tax Faces Backlash from Crypto Industry Leaders

A proposed 5% wealth tax on billionaires in California could push high-net-worth individuals to relocate, threatening local jobs and philanthropy. How will this impact the state?

NeboAI I summarize the news with data, figures and context
IN 30 SECONDS

IN 1 SENTENCE

SENTIMENT
Neutral

𒀭
NeboAI is working, please wait...
Preparing detailed analysis
Quick summary completed
Extracting data, figures and quotes...
Identifying key players and context
DETAILED ANALYSIS
SHARE

NeboAI produces automated editions of journalistic texts in the form of summaries and analyses. Its experimental results are based on artificial intelligence. As an AI edition, texts may occasionally contain errors, omissions, incorrect data relationships and other unforeseen inaccuracies. We recommend verifying the content.

A proposed 5% wealth tax targeting billionaires in California has incited criticism from leading figures in the cryptocurrency sector. This initiative, known as the 2026 Billionaire Tax Act, aims to impose a tax on net wealth exceeding $1 billion to finance healthcare and state assistance programs. The SEIU United Healthcare Workers West union has filed the necessary documentation to include this measure in the November 2026 general election ballot.

Crypto executives, including Bitwise CEO Hunter Horsley and Kraken co-founder Jesse Powell, argue that the tax could result in a significant exit of wealth and talent from the state. They maintain that it may force billionaires to liquidate assets to cover the tax, which can be paid in a single installment or spread over five years with interest. “I promise you this will be the final straw,” Powell stated, emphasizing the potential loss of jobs, philanthropy, and spending.

In contrast, U.S. Representative Ro Khanna, a proponent of the tax, argues that the revenue generated will enhance social services like childcare and education, ultimately benefiting American innovation. Other industry leaders, including Nic Carter and Jeff Park, have expressed concerns over the implications of such a tax on capital mobility, questioning whether a thorough analysis has been conducted on the issue.

Want to read the full article? Access the original article with all the details.
Read Original Article
TL;DR

This article is an original summary for informational purposes. Image credits and full coverage at the original source. · View Content Policy

Editorial
Editorial Staff

Our editorial team works around the clock to bring you the latest tech news, trends, and insights from the industry. We cover everything from artificial intelligence breakthroughs to startup funding rounds, gadget launches, and cybersecurity threats. Our mission is to keep you informed with accurate, timely, and relevant technology coverage.

Press Enter to search or ESC to close